Sinking Coffin Bones del 1/2
When looking at a lateral radiograph of a horse’s foot, if the exact location of the top of the hoof wall (hairline) has been marked with a radiopaque paste or object, there is a measurable distance between the “elevation” of the top of the hoof capsule and the top of the coffin bone. Veterinarians and farriers typically refer to this measurement as the CE (coronet-to-extensor process distance).
The markers (taped-on wires) were placed contouring the hoof wall and stopping precisely at the base of the hairs at the coronet. In figure A, the CE is more than one inch, with most of the short pastern bone (P2) buried within the hoof capsule. In figure B, the same hoof six-months-later, the CE is almost within a normal range (post-treatment). In both photos, the sole thickness is roughly the same, yet the overall wall length in figure A is dramatically longer than in the healthier situation of figure B. Photo reprinted from the book Care and Rehabilitation of the Equine Foot , P. Ramey.
In figure D (left), the toes (and heels) would be considered too long by any hoof professional, yet the soles are paper-thin. If this hoof was to be cut shorter—thus thinning the sole more—it would be severely damaging for the horse. By, instead, focusing on reversing the coffin bone sinking, the same foot (shown in figure E, right) now has a thick sole and a normal heel and toe length (four months duration between photos). Photo reprinted from the book Care and Rehabilitation of the Equine Foot, P. Ramey.
Understanding the Problem
To understand how to reverse or prevent the sinking, you must first understand how and why it occurs. The coffin bone is shaped like a miniature hoof, creating the foundation for the front-half of the horse’s foot. The bone is surrounded by a 1/8-to-1/4-inch “sock” of blood vessels, nerves, and connective tissue. The hoof wall, around the perimeter, and the sole underneath forms a tough outer shell—like a boot—about 1/2-inch-thick. In a natural and healthy situation, the hoof wall and the sole share the load of the horse’s weight. In this situation, the laminae—the bonds between the hoof wall and the coffin bone—have little or no shear stress forces applied to them. However, if the hoof wall is allowed to overgrow well-past the sole, or if a shoe is lifting the sole off the ground, the forces change dramatically—the horse’s entire weight is literally hanging from the laminae. These forces set up two possible scenarios:
- If the diet is correctly balanced and the horse is generally healthy, so that no additional stressors are placed on the integrity of the laminae, the additional vertical forces applied to the laminae may allow the horse to slowly sink through the hoof capsule over time. This can occur without a lot of pain, and can be fairly easy to reverse.
- If the horse’s health is compromised, or if an improper diet is weakening the laminae, the horse may suddenly fall through the hoof capsule, essentially until the sole reaches the ground. This may destroy connective tissue and blood supply to a point that the foot could never be fully healed.
In either case, I feel that the sinking was caused by the unloading of the horse’s sole to begin with—by placing the laminae in the solitary support role, without the aid of the rest of the foot (sole, bars, frogs). This brings us to the concept of the sole penetration. In the most extreme laminitis cases, the coffin bone supposedly pierces through the sole of the horse. Since the sole is skin that literally grows from the bottom of the coffin bone, I do not understand why people believe that this “piercing” can occur—the sole is attached to the bone, and moves around with it wherever it goes. If the bone sinks, so must the sole. So instead, I consider the CE as one issue, and the sole thickness as a completely separate-but-important issue. In cases that people believe the bone penetrated the sole; I would, instead, be asking why the sole is missing. Did the corium abscess and allow the sole to fall off? Did someone cut it off? Did it wear away? Has it failed to grow? This may seem like a simple semantics game, but if we ask the right questions, we are more likely to find the right answers.
Luckily, most cases of coffin bone sinking aren’t quite so dramatic. Instead, all you will notice over time is that the toes (and/or heels) seem to be getting longer, or the soles seem to be getting thinner, or both. The horse is not quite as sound as he used to be—or is not an easy-mover anymore. If radiographs verify that the CE is ½- to ¾-inch or more, your horse will benefit from a conscious effort to reverse the situation. To do this, we basically set up the opposite of the forces that caused the situation to begin with. We try to reduce the load on the walls, while increasing the load on the rest of the foot. This means frequent trimming of the walls, conservation of the sole and frog tissue, and using hoof boots with padded insoles to compensate for the reduced support that would normally be provided by longer hoof walls.
Since the laminae are weakened by sugar overload and/or mineral imbalances, we also carefully balance the diet. This gives the best chance of success by helping the wall connection be the best it can be.
Tak til Pete Ramey for at måtte gengive og oversætte hans artikler.
Hovbensrotation eller nedsunken hovben del 1/2
Her kigger vi på et røntgenbillede taget fra lateral side, hvor den eksakte position af hårlinjen, er markeret med en markør, ser vi en målbar afstand mellem den øverste del af hovkapslen der her er “forhøjet” (billede A) og den øverste del af hovbenet. Dyrlæger og beslagsmede betegner ofte dette mål som CE (Coronet-to-extensor process distance).
Markørerne (tråde med tape) blev anbragt på hovæggen og stoppede præcist ved bunden af hårene ved kronranden. I figur A er CE mere end 2,5 cm, med størsteparten af kronbenet (P2) begravet i hovkapslen. I figur B, den samme hov seks måneder senere, er CE næsten inden for normalområdet (efter behandling). På begge billeder er såltykkelsen nogenlunde den samme, men alligevel er den samlede hovvægslængde i figur A dramatisk længere end i den sundere situation i figur B. Foto genoptrykt fra bogen Care and Rehabilitation of the Equine Foot , P. Ramey.